Today’s Cat Classic is Disney’s animated version of Alice in Wonderland (1951), featuring,
of course, the Cheshire Cat.
The plot and the cat
Young Alice (voiced by Kathryn Beaumont) is a rather silly
daydreamer whose imagination is so much more interesting than the boring old
real world. One day while she’s supposed to be listening to a reading about
history, Alice sees a well-dressed White Rabbit run by declaring he’s
late for a very important date. She and her kitten, Dinah, ditch the lesson and
follow the rabbit to the rabbit hole. Alice falls down a deep shaft, and her
adventures begin. Along the way, she shrinks and grows and shrinks again, she
meets some talking flowers, and of course (most relevant to our purposes) she
meets the Cheshire Cat.
This grinning cat can disappear whenever he wants to. He can
also remove his head from his body. He can stand on his head (and not the way
you’ve seen human yoga enthusiasts do it). As he is portrayed in this film
(voiced by Sterling Holloway), he is pink with purple stripes and bright yellow
eyes. He is mischievous and not exactly trustworthy. He likes to sing lines
from the poem “Jabberwocky.” This is a cat who likes to poke a stick at trouble
(as long as it’s trouble for someone else) and see what happens. It’s the
Cheshire Cat who sends Alice on a shortcut that puts her in the path of the
Queen of Hearts, a maniac who enjoys removing people’s heads from their
bodies (and not the way the Cat does it).
A little history
We knew virtually nothing about this film before writing
this post, and we were surprised by many things we learned. For example, Walt
Disney had first thought of casting Mary Pickford in a film combining live
action and animation. But then came Paramount’s 1933 live-action Alice in Wonderland, and Disney had to
rethink things. Later in the 1930s, a Disney storyboard artist and an art
director started working out the story and look of the film, but the boss
wasn’t satisfied with the results. Then World War II intervened, and serious
work didn’t resume on Alice until
1947, when Aldous Huxley (he of Brave New
World fame) was hired to write a new script. But still Disney wasn’t
satisfied, so the script was rewritten yet again.
But, even after all that work, Disney was said to be
disappointed with the final film.
Our verdict
Somehow, old SoLT had lived nearly 50 years without ever
seeing Alice in Wonderland—in fact,
without reading the books it’s based on or seeing any other film adaptation of
the story. This is another film the way they used to make them—only about an
hour and a quarter long. But still, old SoLT managed to fall asleep during it.
We think we can see why Disney wasn’t totally pleased with Alice.
There are a lot of characters, and while the
non-computer-generated animation is a joy to watch, the story isn’t as cohesive
as we would have liked. The end seemed abrupt to us—we were just suddenly at
the “happily ever after” part (yes, even after we went back to watch the part
someone slept through). Maybe 75 minutes isn’t long enough to tell this story,
or maybe they could have done with fewer characters and created a tighter, more
engrossing adaptation of Lewis Carroll’s work. And honestly, Alice mostly got
on our nerves. She was over-the-top silly for much of the movie, and it would
have been nice to see some more depth to her character.
Still and all, we can’t say we didn’t like this film. We
have already mentioned the animation, which is filled with bright, bold colors.
There are moments of humor, as when Alice suddenly grows and gets stuck in the
White Rabbit’s house. The Queen of Hearts is insane in a horribly entertaining way. Of course we love the Cheshire Cat character, with his wacky but dark nature. And let's not forget the cute kitten Dinah!
A
note on the "Paws Up" system: Miss C gives either one or two paws up.
One paw is for a good movie; two paws is for a great movie. She never gives
three or four paws because that would require her to lie on her back...and Miss
C does
not do
that!
The
link below is an Amazon Associates link. If you purchase anything through this
link, old SoLT and I could get some coin for our kibble account. Thank you!
Sources
“Alice in Wonderland (1951),” IMDb, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0043274/?ref_=ttawd_awd_tt
“Alice in Wonderland (1951),” Cinema Cats, http://www.cinemacats.com/?p=8586
“About Disney’s ‘Alice in Wonderland’ 1951 Cartoon Movie,”
Alice-in-wonderland.net, http://www.alice-in-wonderland.net/resources/background/disneys-cartoon-movie/.
Oh this is my favorite of Holloway's voice acting rolls, I think he was enjoying himself by his tone. It is rushed as it squoze chunks of Through the Looking Glass into the Wonderland story.
ReplyDeleteIf I've ever read the actual book, I certainly do NOT remember. Am sure I've seen this movie, but a bazillion years ago. I prefer the episode of Star Trek, that includes Alice, the rabbit, and a few other fantasy characters...Doctor McCoy ends up with a couple of showgirls...LOL!
ReplyDeleteI'll have to look up that Star Trek episode. I don't remember it at all!
DeleteI LOVED the book as a child, and I read Through the Looking Glass too. I was so very disappointed when I saw the Disney version when I was a child and I did not want to go and see any of his other cartoonification of the classic fairy tales. I have to agree...my favorite of all that I've seen is the Star Trek version!
ReplyDeletePurrs
Marv and Barb
I have never seen this version. I liked the Johnny Depp one though :)
ReplyDeleteI have a fun Alice in Wonderland story! When I was a little girl my parents took me to a kids park with a mock-up of the rabbit hole. I was afraid if I went in the right way I would shrink, so I made my parents take me in backwards. Needless to say, we got some strange looks ;)
ReplyDeleteMy Paul is a member of the Lewis Caroll Society in England, I am sure they watch this movie with bemusement. I have not seen this but I have seen Beauty and the Beat (Disney real and animated) and prefer the animated one. OK Now you reviewed it I am going to have to watch it!!!
ReplyDelete